Positive reward Essay

It good deal also be maintained that Kistler had more urge of continuing his practical(prenominal) mischief since he was able to, for the most expound, obtain versed delight through the means of the internet which could have been an easy method for Kistler to happen upon his aims. The pleasure he gets is a form of a positive wages at least in the context of Kistler as opposed to the belief that the pleasure he gets is not actually any sort of pay back to others especially to the victims.By admitting that he knew that what he did was essentially wrong possibly in the legal and clean-living senses, it leads one and only(a) to the realization that Kistler whitethorn unconsciously place his personal actions as behaviors that override any existing proscriptions against them. Thus, by considering his pedophilic behavior as one that is wrong yet fulfilling in sexual terms, Kistler eventually treats his behavior as one that is above what is being proscribe or disallowed by the l arger guild of which he is a part of.Further, his absence of knowing that he was causing deteriorationor at least as far as he revealsholds a bonny argument that pertains to the corresponding absence of an effort to deliberately put a stop to his behavior. That is, since Kistler was not well aware that he was causing harm to his victims, there was no apparent reason for him to adjust accordingly or to realign his behavior according to the normal conducts within the society, to legal and moral prescriptions, and to what is prohibited.Otherwise, had Kistler known the negative effects his behavior has been causing, there remains the prospect that he may have discontinued his actionsor he may have not. What is more important is the idea that there are reasons merchant ship Kistlers behavior albeit having the knowledge that his behavior is one of the things the status quo of the society is against. Nevertheless, Kistler was sentenced to 24 years of federal imprisonment a contemporar y eccentric to the ancient Roman law ignorance of the law is no excuse (Brudner, 1995, p. 224).Since the learnedness process contains the appropriation of punishments and rewards in the SLT, there remains the implied cause that Kistler initially engaged in his pedophilic behavior and continued to do so aft(prenominal)ward he was able to obtain a reward for soliciting sexually intelligible images from adolescent girls. Even further, his initial behavior of engaging into internet squirt pornography may have also sprung from a variety of reasons which, after engaging into the act, led Kistler to obtain a rewarding recognise more often than not in the form of sexual satisfaction.Although the far more original causes beyond the subsequent continuance of his actions are of interest as well, the primary reverence of the SLT remains to the direct conditioning of the behavior of the individual or of, specifically, Kistler. The model of direct conditioning tolerate be illustrated i n the case where the experience of traumatic situations in the dental surgery is linked with the occurrence of timidity by means of the learning of a correlation of pain as well as distress with the dental situation (Milson, Tickle, Humphris, & Blinkhorn, 2003, p. 495).Conversely, the case of Kistler can be analyzed in terms of the concept of direct conditioning. That is, the sexually rewarding experience of Kistler with regards to his pornographic exploits can be seen as one that is associated with the occurrence of the feeling of liking what he does through the learning of a correlation of sexual satisfaction with online child pornography by pretension as a dying teenage boy and appealing to teenage girls to send sexually explicit images.